Karan
Kharb
Sadly, the
institution of India’s Army Chief has once again been dragged into insalubrious
controversy. BJP has reportedly asked the Election Commission to restrain the
UPA Government from announcing the name of Gen Bikram Singh’s successor leaving
it for the next Government to decide. Ironically, all the politicking in this
context is not from any politician but from one of Army’s own former Chiefs,
Gen VK Singh who is now a BJP contender for the Ghaziabad parliamentary seat. Civilians look up to generals and military
veterans as symbols of selfless service, chivalry and candour. Soldiers look up
to their generals – serving or retired – as examples of high standards of character
and, therefore, sources of great inspiration. Are we really living up to those
aspirations? Is it really the oft-repeated Neta-Babu nexus or the military’s
very own brass of yester years harming it more brutally and effectively than
the former?
Whenever
politics has meddled with the top appointments of the Armed Forces, the
manipulation was explained away in the name of 'merit over seniority' even as merit
itself was the first casualty of such manipulation. The case of Lt Gen SK
Sinha, a highly meritorious and senior most general who was superseded by his
junior (Gen Vaidya) in the run to the top is a glaring example. Since then,
however, the principle of 'seniority' has almost solidified as a convention in
appointing the Chiefs in the Armed Forces. The only departure from this
convention in the recent times was Vice Admiral RK Dhowan’s appointment as the
Navy Chief passing over the senior most in line Vice Admiral Shekhar Sinha. The
reasons in the wake of Admiral Joshi’s sudden and unexpected resignation owning
moral responsibility for a chain of mishaps seemed plausible, as Sinha owed
some tough explanations.
It is not
difficult to see that this unsavoury controversy has been engineered to scuttle
the chances of Army’s present Vice Chief, Lt Gen Dalbir Singh Suhag, the
obvious and rightful successor to Gen Bikram Singh being the senior most among
the equally qualified top generals of the Army. It is openly known to all now
that VK Singh’s behaviour towards Suhag has been vindictive and pre-determined
since long. Equally obvious is the fact that if Suhag is eased out of the way,
Lt Gen Ashok Singh, a close family relation (samdhi) of VK Singh becomes
the first pick to succeed the present incumbent. And we thought scheming and trickery were not
soldierly traits!
There is no
such rule or convention that binds the Government to announce the name of the
next Chief of the Army Staff within two or three months. Gen VK Singh’s name
was announced three months prior to Gen Kapoor’s retirement. Also, it is absurd
to invoke ‘Model Code of Conduct’ to restrain the UPA Government in this matter
because announcement of the next Army Chief’s name does not in any way
influence voter behaviour during elections. Nor will it be fair to assume that
the present UPA government should cease to function even in matters of Defence
and routine governance.
Unfortunately,
Gen VK Singh has a knack of courting unseemly controversies too frequently. As Army Chief, he made more news for issues as
tiny as his own date of birth than concentrating on higher and nobler missions
of sharpening military’s effectiveness in matters of national defence and
security. Soon after his retirement, a serving Army Major who visited the
former Chief’s house in Delhi Cantt for official reasons, was humiliated and detained
for hours allegedly for electronic eaves-dropping – a charge that could not be
substantiated. For the first time ever in free India’s history, the high Office
of the Chief of the Army Staff came to be maligned when he was at the helm for secretly
monitoring the goings-on in the Office of the Defence Minister by employing his
favourite ‘Technical Support Division’ (TSD) and its high tech electronic
surveillance equipment. As if that was not enough, he pushed the Indian Army
and the Government of India deep into embarrassment by openly claiming in a
media interview that the “military intelligence was doling out cash to the
politicians in J&K.”
After
hobnobbing and jockeying with politicians and activists of all hues ranging
from Chautala to Anna Hazare, from kissans to students, he now seems finally
settled as a full time politician. Streets
are abuzz that if he wins he might be India’s next Defence Minister. No doubt, in
his rich military experience the next Government might find enough potential to
uplift the sagging morale of the Defence Services due to continuing bureaucratic
red tape and neglect. At the same time, his personal agenda and a vindictive
nature threaten to tie him to petty considerations upsetting the military
confidence and aggravating the already vitiated civil-military relationship at
the highest level. Ideally, he would require capacity to absorb, magnanimity to
accept, courage to bow and sincerity to place national interests above self,
family and relations.
The system of
promotion boards in the Armed Forces is such that it is not feasible – if we
must trust the process – for a mediocre officer to reach the levels of Army
Commander/Vice Chief. Therefore, it would be only fair to reinforce the healthy
conventions already established by letting the senior most general in line (Lt
Gen Dalbir Singh Suhag) succeed Gen Bikram Singh. It will also protect the Army
against fears and suspicions of malice and vendetta that have been eating away
military’s moral fibre from within and without. Only if there goes something seriously
and glaringly wrong in the conduct and performance of the prospective senior in
line should the Government have the prerogative to go for the next one in line
as has been done for the Indian Navy. Sanity calls for the raging battle to
cease and the hatchet to be buried.
____________________________________________________________________
The writer is a military veteran and author.
The writer is a military veteran and author.
No comments:
Post a Comment